The compact SUV segment has grown rapidly over the years, with the Nissan Juke playing a key role in its popularity. When the Juke first launched in 2010, it introduced many drivers to the idea of a small, urban-friendly SUV with a distinctive design. Despite some shortcomings, particularly in its interior quality and practicality, the original Juke became a huge sales hit for Nissan.
Dimensions Overview
dimensions of a vehicle give us a good indication of how it might perform on the road and the amount of space it offers inside. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the Nissan Juke and Ford Puma:
| Feature | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,210 mm | 4,207 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm | 1,805 mm |
| Height | 1,595 mm | 1,537 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,636 mm | 2,588 mm |
Ground Clearance
Ground clearance is crucial for navigating rougher roads or tackling obstacles like speed bumps.
| Ground Clearance | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement | 172 mm | 166 mm |
With slightly more ground clearance, the Nissan Juke may be better equipped for less-than-perfect roads.
Height and Width Comparison
The height and width of a car significantly impact its interior space and comfort levels. Let’s compare the dimensions of these two models:
| Dimension | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Height | 1,595 mm | 1,537 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm | 1,805 mm |
Width:- slightly wider Ford Puma might feel roomier, particularly in the front seats.
Wheelbase
A car’s wheelbase affects both ride comfort and interior space. Generally, a longer wheelbase offers more stability and legroom:
| Wheelbase | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement | 2,636 mm | 2,588 mm |
Nissan Juke’s longer wheelbase might offer a smoother ride and more legroom for passengers in the back.
Boot Space
Boot space is a key consideration for many buyers, especially if you frequently carry luggage or other large items.
| Boot Space | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | 422 liters | 456 liters |
| Seats Folded | 1,305 liters | 1,216 liters |
Seats Folded:- Nissan Juke offers more space with the rear seats down, which is useful for transporting larger items.
Interior Comfort and Technology
On the inside, both Nissan Juke and Ford Puma have upped their game significantly compared to their previous models. The Juke’s interior is now more refined, featuring high-quality materials and a more stylish design, with options like Alcantara trim available in higher-spec versions. The Ford Puma also offers a well-built cabin, with soft-touch materials in key areas, although some harder plastics can still be found. When it comes to driving position, the Ford Puma has the edge with its sporty and well-aligned setup. The seats are comfortable, and higher trims even come with a massaging function. Visibility is decent, although somewhat restricted by thick pillars. Nissan Juke also offers a good driving position but lacks the massaging seats found in the Puma. However, it does include a 360-degree camera, which is a step above the Puma’s standard reversing camera.
Both vehicles come equipped with 8-inch touchscreens, featuring Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The Puma’s system is slightly more user-friendly, though both systems could benefit from faster response times. The Ford Puma also offers an optional 12.3-inch digital driver display, which is clear and easy to read, though not as customizable as some rival systems. The Juke, on the other hand, sticks with analog dials, supplemented by a small digital screen in the center.
Driving Experience
Ford Puma stands out for its engaging driving dynamics, with responsive steering and nimble handling, especially on winding roads. It maintains excellent body control, making it a fun car to drive. The Puma’s suspension is on the firmer side, which can result in a slightly less comfortable ride on rough surfaces, but this firmness contributes to its overall driving enjoyment.
Nissan Juke, while much improved over its predecessor, doesn’t quite match the Puma in terms of driving excitement. It’s more focused on providing a comfortable ride, with a softer suspension that’s well-suited for city driving and longer trips. However, this comes at the expense of agility and sharpness in handling.
Nissan Juke and Ford Puma are both solid options in the compact SUV market, each offering its own set of strengths. The Juke impresses with its distinctive design, comfortable ride, and slightly higher ground clearance, making it a great choice for those who prioritize comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the Ford Puma delivers a more engaging driving experience, a roomier boot, and better overall value, particularly in the higher trims. Ford Puma is an excellent choice. However, if you’re drawn to a more unique design and a bit more comfort, the Nissan Juke might be the right fit for you.
